Sorry, I forgot to mention I was replying Dave.
On Oct 30, 2013 7:59 PM, "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <
rr.rosas / gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Issue #9064 has been updated by rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas).
>
>
> fuadksd (Fuad Saud) wrote:
> > To define a constant you could use Module#const_set...
>
> Was this message target at me? If so, I didn't understand how const_set
> could help implementing this feature. Would you mind in explaining what you
> meant by using const_set?
> ----------------------------------------
> Feature #9064: Add support for packages, like in Java
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9064#change-42666
>
> Author: rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)
> Status: Open
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
> Category: core
> Target version:
>
>
> In Java, it's easy to define a package for a certain class:
>
> package com.company.MyClass
>
> We don't use that convention in Ruby but we have another way of packaging
> classes:
>
> module MyLibrary
>   module InnerNamespace
>     class MyClass
>     end
>   end
> end
>
> I'd prefer to be able to use something like this instead meaning exactly
> the same thing:
>
> package MyLibrary::InnerNamespace # or MyLibrary.InnerNamespace, I don't
> really care
> class MyClass
> end
>
> Could you please consider this idea?
>
>
> --
> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
>