On Aug 17, 2013, at 8:55 AM, alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov) wrote:

> Maybe it is ok to use Hash#<< as #merge or similar.  It would be nice =
however IMO to have something similar for #reverse_merge too.

I completely agree that it would be nice to have an operator for Hash =
that behaved similar to reverse_merge.  Using Hash#| as a =
reverse_merge-ish operator is being discussed in #7739.  I think I would =
end up using the reverse_merge-ish operator more than the merge-ish =
operator.

Dave