(7/8/13 5:36 PM), V?t Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 8.7.2013 17:03, Yorick Peterse napsal(a):
>> Out of curiosity, does this tool take into account deprecated/internal
>> symbols? rb_f_lambda has been deprecated for a while now and didn't do
>> anything but call "rb_block_lambda". The function still appears to be
>> located in proc.c though.
>>
>> Yorick
>>
>
> I know it was deprecated. Nevertheless, removal of the function
> definition was definitely not needed. It fixes nothing while there is
> tiny chance that it may break something.
>
> With my maintainer of Ruby for Red Hat Enterprise Linux hat, how am I
> supposed to defend the need of rebase of Ruby to the latest point
> release, when it introduces ABI breakage?

When you have your specific requirement, your should use your hand instead of us.
Write a tool or watch a branch update by yourself.

We don't intent to break anything. But we don't guarantee it especially if it is out
of our scope.