Issue #8341 has been updated by ktsj (Kazuki Tsujimoto).


Oops, r41361 is also needed.
----------------------------------------
Backport #8341: block_given? (and the actual block) persist between calls to a proc created from a method (using method().to_proc()).
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8341#change-40004

Author: pythonesque (Joshua Yanovski)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga)
Category: 
Target version: 


Confirmed on both 2.0.0 and 1.9.2-p290.  A testcase (utilizing RSpec) is attached, but the behavior is easy to demonstrate without a testcase or RSpec.

First, we define a method that can optionally accept a block.
  def foo
    if block_given?
      yield
    else
      puts "No block given."
    end
  end

Then, we convert the method to a proc and store it in a variable.
  method_to_proc = method(:foo).to_proc

Now, we try calling method_to_proc without a block, getting the expected result:
  method_to_proc.call
  # => No block given.

We call it again, this time with a block, and again get the expected result:
  method_to_proc.call { puts "Block given." }
  # => Block given.

But when we call it a third time, again with no block...
  method_to_proc.call
  # => Block given.
...it remembers the previous proc that was passed in.

If we then call it with a new proc, it overwrites the old proc as expected (this is not tested in the testcase, which only tests block_given?):
  method_to_proc.call { puts "New block given." }
  # => New block given.

The testcase verifies this behavior, and also that the behavior does not occur when calling a method in the usual way, or when using method() but not to_proc(), or when using method().to_proc() but not storing the result in the same variable (the last of which isn't that surprising but is included for completeness).

I cannot see any reason that this should be expected behavior.  Either block_given? should work the same way in method.to_proc()s as it does in method()s, or it should always return false, and it certainly shouldn't "remember" the last block used.


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/