Charlie Somerville <charlie / charliesomerville.com> wrote:
> > I prefer `st_' related name. But not strong opinion.
> I disagree because they are unrelated data structures.

In any case, I strongly prefer new sa_* functions (and more importantly
data-structures) not be publically visible to C extensions.  Exposing
st_* was a mistake (IMHO) and makes it harder to maintain compatibility
while making internal improvements.

Also, I think "sa_" prefix is confusing since sigaction already uses it.
Maybe "sary_"?