(2013/04/29 15:46), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
> * Most of the benchmarks do not have enough old data to make a difference.

Yes.

We can see
- overhead of WBs
- overhead of generational gc (increasing dead but un-collected objects)

And this observation is for trivial optimization (WB implementation, and
so on). I want to reduce such overhead. Ideally, it should be same time
with current M&S gc.

> * This seems like a nice segway toward more explicit reference management, as in JNI.

Yes. And what "our technique is cool" is we can go this way *gradually*.
We don't change all of them at a time.

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net