(2013/04/29 15:46), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote: > * Most of the benchmarks do not have enough old data to make a difference. Yes. We can see - overhead of WBs - overhead of generational gc (increasing dead but un-collected objects) And this observation is for trivial optimization (WB implementation, and so on). I want to reduce such overhead. Ideally, it should be same time with current M&S gc. > * This seems like a nice segway toward more explicit reference management, as in JNI. Yes. And what "our technique is cool" is we can go this way *gradually*. We don't change all of them at a time. -- // SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net