Issue #8281 has been updated by shugo (Shugo Maeda).

Status changed from Open to Assigned
Assignee set to shugo (Shugo Maeda)


----------------------------------------
Bug #8281: Net::IMAP can't parse response to the IMAP SETACL command correctly
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8281#change-38642

Author: adantel (Alex Filatau)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: shugo (Shugo Maeda)
Category: 
Target version: 
ruby -v: 2.0.0


Found in ruby-2.0.0-p0

I'm working right now on upgrade of our test system from ruby 1.9.2 to ruby 2.0.0. Unfortunately, one of the test scripts that works flawlessly with ruby 1.9.2 is failing when trying to parse response of GETACL command. See the debug of the session below:

C: RUBY0002 CREATE INBOX/share
S: RUBY0002 OK CREATE completed
C: RUBY0003 SETACL INBOX/share imshare1copy1366146467 / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com lrswickxteda
S: RUBY0003 OK SETACL completed
C: RUBY0004 GETACL INBOX/share
S: * ACL "INBOX/share" "imshare2copy1366146467 / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com" lrswickxteda "imshare1copy1366146467 / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com" lrswickxteda
@str: "* ACL \"INBOX/share\" \"imshare2copy1366146467 / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com\" lrswickxteda \"imshare1copy1366146467 / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com\" lrswickxteda\r\n"
@pos: 19
@lex_state: EXPR_BEG
@token.symbol: QUOTED
@token.value: "INBOX/share"
#<Net::IMAP::ResponseParseError: unexpected token QUOTED (expected CRLF)>
/usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p0/lib/ruby/2.0.0/net/imap.rb:3363:in `parse_error'
/usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p0/lib/ruby/2.0.0/net/imap.rb:3215:in `match'
/usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p0/lib/ruby/2.0.0/net/imap.rb:2136:in `response'
/usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p0/lib/ruby/2.0.0/net/imap.rb:2058:in `parse'
/usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p0/lib/ruby/2.0.0/net/imap.rb:1181:in `get_response'
/usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p0/lib/ruby/2.0.0/net/imap.rb:1089:in `receive_responses'
/usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p0/lib/ruby/2.0.0/net/imap.rb:1075:in `block in initialize'

Please note, the same piece is working fine with ruby 1.9.2


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/