On Apr 3, 2013 9:30 PM, "Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas" <rr.rosas / gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Em 03-04-2013 01:10, phluid61 (Matthew Kerwin) escreveu:
>
>> Issue #8191 has been updated by phluid61 (Matthew Kerwin).
>>
>> Throwing this out there for discussion: how about a completely different
syntax?
>>
>>   user&&.profile&&.website&&.thumbnail
>
> Why not simply user&.profile&.website&.thumbnail?
>

Just because at a glance most of us recognise && as a logical operation and
& as arithmetic.