Issue #7936 has been updated by zzak (Zachary Scott).


nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote:
> Yes, it's meaningful, but the documents are inaccurate on that point.

Thank you for your feedback, always appreciated nobu-san.

> I'd suggest to change the argument names and mention that it can be a symbol or a string.

Do you mean for *_defined? methods or for all methods mentioned in this patch?

----------------------------------------
Backport #7936: backport r39449
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7936#change-37919

Author: zzak (Zachary Scott)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga)
Category: 
Target version: 





-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/