Austin Ziegler wrote:
> 
> Cygwin isn't a functional or utilitarian choice. Cygwin is a lazy
> answer to people who aren't interested in supporting other platforms.
> Usually people who have only developed on Linux.
> 
> There is a fundamental disconnect between the usability of cygwin and
> Windows. When you have to think in a different filesystem on the same
> computer, there's no measure of utilitarianism there. It's all about
> lazyness instead.

I have to completely agree with this. I long ago removed cygwin from my 
deveopment machine and I will not install it again.

Curt