Issue #7939 has been updated by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).


From http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/HowToRequestFeatures, I believe this FR fails point (1) "Ensure it's a meaningful improvement" and (2) "what's a good name".

It's pretty clear Nobu's example is more concise and nicer than what `assuming` would provide. BTW, the `.curry(3)` part can simply be `.curry`.

I second Nobu in rejecting this FR, but Matz can do it if you prefer.
----------------------------------------
Feature #7939: Alternative curry function creation
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7939#change-36960

Author: drKreso (Kresimir Bojcic)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category: core
Target version: next minor


=begin
I really like the new "(({assuming}))" method used for currying in Perl 6.

For example if I loose my mind and implement ((%fizzbuzz%)) via currying I can do it like this:

  fb = ->(modulo_number, message, x) { message if x % modulo_number == 0 }
  fizzbuzz = fb.curry[15,"FizzBuzz"]
  fizz = fb.curry[3, "Fizz"]
  buzz = fb.curry[5, "Buzz"]
  (1..100).each { |i| puts fizzbuzz[i] || fizz[i] || buzz[i] || i }

Here the first hurdle is that curry is somewhat mathematical, and the secons is that you need to use (({[]})) for function invoking...
If we had something similar to this:

  class Proc
    def assuming(*args)
      curry.call *args
    end
  end

It could be written more naturally IMO:

  fb = ->(modulo_number, message, x) { message if x % modulo_number == 0 }
  fizzbuzz = fb.assuming(15,"FizzBuzz")
  buzz = fb.assuming(5, "Buzz")
  fizz = fb.assuming(3,"Fizz")

  (1..100).each { |i| puts fizzbuzz[i] || fizz[i] || buzz[i] || i }
=end



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/