I agree, but it is too late to change 2.0.0.
Let's consider it towards 2.1.0.

2013/2/23 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro / gmail.com>:
> (2/22/13 7:53 PM), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
>> I feel the NEWS are in the wrong order: C API, builtin classes, std-lib, language changes, compatibility.
>>
>> I realize the C API section is short, but why is it first when 99.9% of rubyists don't care? Aren't language changes the most important ones, and if so, why do they come after the std lib?
>>
>> I would recommend an order based on how many people should know about the changes:
>>
>> * Language changes
>> * Builtin classes
>>   - Changes
>>   - Compatibility issues (builtin classes)
>> * Stdlib
>>   - Changes
>>   - Compatibility issues (std-lib)
>> * C API changes
>>
>> Objections?
>
> +1.
> This seems very good suggestion!
>



-- 
Yusuke Endoh <mame / tsg.ne.jp>