< :前の番号
^ :番号順リスト
> :次の番号
P :前の記事（スレッド移動）
N :次の記事（スレッド移動）
|<:前のスレッド
>|:次のスレッド
^ :返事先
_:自分への返事
>:同じ返事先を持つ記事（前）
<:同じ返事先を持つ記事（後）
---:分割してスレッド表示、再表示
| :分割して（縦）スレッド表示、再表示
~ :スレッドのフレーム消去
.:インデックス
..:インデックスのインデックス
Issue #7564 has been updated by zenspider (Ryan Davis).
Status changed from Rejected to Open
No, really. This is a bug that needs more eyeballs.
A respond_to? with just a super should be equivalent to no code at all.
Can we get Matz and Mame to weigh in?
----------------------------------------
Bug #7564: r38175 introduces incompatibility
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7564#change-35184
Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: mame (Yusuke Endoh)
Category: core
Target version: 2.0.0
ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-12-15 trunk 38381) [x86_64-darwin12.2.1]
r38175 introduces incompatibility with 1.9.3. Before r38175, when looking for _dump, Marshal would not call method_missing. Now marshal calls method_missing when trying to dump.
The following example exits with no error on 1.9.3, but on trunk it raises an exception (_dump() must return string (TypeError)):
class TR
def initialize calls = []
@calls = calls
end
def method_missing name, *args
@calls << [name, args]
end
end
Marshal.dump TR.new
I've attached a test case.
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/