Bugs item #1940, was opened at 2005-05-22 00:15 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1940&group_id=426 Category: Core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Murphy (Kornelius Kalnbach) (murphy) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Fixnum#** slower than Bignum#** Initial Comment: (original text by Wolfgang NĂ¡dasi-Donner) The German Ruby forum (http://rubyforen.de) recognized a strange behaviour of the Fixnum class. In exponentation, Fixnum is much slower than Bignum, which lets us assume that some kind of a problem is in the implementation. Example: >>>>> Code (Ruby) >>>>> require 'benchmark' N = 10**6 B = 65891264863465298234965902602612457060348499377 F = 4628 Benchmark.bmbm(10) do |bm| bm.report('Bignum') do N.times do B ** 0.5 end end bm.report('Fixnum') do N.times do F ** 0.5 end end end >>>>> Result >>>>> user system total real Bignum 3.856000 0.000000 3.856000 ( 3.946000) Fixnum 7.861000 0.020000 7.881000 ( 8.081000) >>>>> End of Example >>>>> Further investigations lead to the responsible C code: >>>>> Code (C) >>>>> // in numeric.c static VALUE fix_pow(x, y) VALUE x, y; { if (FIXNUM_P(y)) { long a, b; b = FIX2LONG(y); if (b == 0) return INT2FIX(1); if (b == 1) return x; a = FIX2LONG(x); if (b > 0) { return rb_big_pow(rb_int2big(a), y); } return rb_float_new(pow((double)a, (double)b)); } return rb_num_coerce_bin(x, y); // <-- this take a lot of time } // ...versus... // in bignum.c VALUE rb_big_pow(x, y) VALUE x, y; { double d; long yy; if (y == INT2FIX(0)) return INT2FIX(1); switch (TYPE(y)) { case T_FLOAT: // <-- this is fast d = RFLOAT(y)->value; break; case T_BIGNUM: ... case T_FIXNUM: ... default: return rb_num_coerce_bin(x, y); } return rb_float_new(pow(rb_big2dbl(x), d)); } >>>>> End of Code >>>>> If it's a feature, maybe someone can explain. If it's a bug, maybe someone can fix ;) German readers may be interested in the original thread: http://www.rubyforen.de/topic,749.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=1940&group_id=426