Issue #6478 has been updated by alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov).


Maybe `BasicObject` is not intended to be subclassed directly?  Why not to subclass `Object` instead?  I do not think it is wrong that basic objects do not know who their class is, after all they are basic.
----------------------------------------
Feature #6478: BasicObject#__class__
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6478#change-32753

Author: trans (Thomas Sawyer)
Status: Feedback
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category: core
Target version: next minor


How else is one supposed to get the class of a subclass of BasicObject?



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/