On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:26 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1 / atdot.net> wrote: > (2012/10/31 0:31), KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >>> Target version changed from 2.0.0 to next minor >>> I am sorry but it's too late. I admit my fault. >> >> Matz, I don't like this decision. I believe we should choose next _major_ >> or 2.0.0. minor release should not have binary incompatibility as far >> as possible. >> Is this typo? If no, I'd like to propose pull it back. declaration >> moving is not big task. > > Maybe, we don't define what is major and what is minor. > > On 2.0.x, we shouldn't change binary compatibility. > But 2.1.x or later, I think it is acceptable. > (and some people don't accept :)) Ok, please ignore my last mail then. :)