On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:26 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1 / atdot.net> wrote:
> (2012/10/31 0:31), KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>> Target version changed from 2.0.0 to next minor
>>> I am sorry but it's too late. I admit my fault.
>>
>> Matz, I don't like this decision. I believe we should choose next _major_
>> or 2.0.0. minor release should not have binary incompatibility as far
>> as possible.
>> Is this typo? If no, I'd like to propose pull it back. declaration
>> moving is not big task.
>
> Maybe, we don't define what is major and what is minor.
>
> On 2.0.x, we shouldn't change binary compatibility.
> But 2.1.x or later, I think it is acceptable.
> (and some people don't accept :))

Ok, please ignore my last mail then. :)