(2012/10/31 0:31), KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> Target version changed from 2.0.0 to next minor
>> I am sorry but it's too late. I admit my fault.
> 
> Matz, I don't like this decision. I believe we should choose next _major_
> or 2.0.0. minor release should not have binary incompatibility as far
> as possible.
> Is this typo? If no, I'd like to propose pull it back. declaration
> moving is not big task.

Maybe, we don't define what is major and what is minor.

On 2.0.x, we shouldn't change binary compatibility.
But 2.1.x or later, I think it is acceptable.
(and some people don't accept :))

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net