Dne 29.7.2012 4:36, SASADA Koichi napsal(a):
> Sorry for late response.
>
> (2012/07/03 13:26), vo.x (Vit Ondruch) wrote:
>> ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:
>>>   (but I can't understand sed script ^^;  I prefer ruby script :)
>> As I said, there are several conditions which should be fulfilled. If you don't want to
>>
>> 1) store the generated files in SCM
>> 2) generate the scripts during preparation of tarball by release manager
>> 3) want to have Ruby available during build from tarball
>>
>> than you don't have other option than to use something (in this case sed) what is probably available on your system during the build time. So although I would prefer Ruby, it does not fulfill the 3 conditions above.
> I don't check what dtrace needs correctly, but is not enough?:
>
> (1) build miniruby with dummy header (manged in SCM)
> (2) generate dtrace related files with miniruby
> (3) build ruby with (2)
>

If somebody can help with this setup, I definitely won't oppose. But I'm 
afraid I don't know how to do it by myself :/