(2012/07/12 8:58), zenspider (Ryan Davis) wrote:
> GIMME GIMME GIMME! waaaaaant... We don't _need_ a verifier. User responsibility... etc etc.

Without a verifier, it is easy to cause SEGV or critical trouble.  Matz
prohibits such feature.

You can use it from C ext.

  VALUE rb_iseq_load(VALUE data, VALUE parent, VALUE opt);

... ah, the signature of this function is not exposed by GCC's
visibility control.  I'll make it public (unofficial).

Toward 2.0, I'll make verifier if I have a spare time (but not high
priority).

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net