< :Á°¤ÎÈÖ¹æ
^ :ÈÖ¹æ½ç¥ê¥¹¥È
> :¼¡¤ÎÈÖ¹æ
P :Á°¤Îµ»ö¡Ê¥¹¥ì¥Ã¥É°Üư¡Ë
N :¼¡¤Îµ»ö¡Ê¥¹¥ì¥Ã¥É°Üư¡Ë
|<:Á°¤Î¥¹¥ì¥Ã¥É
>|:¼¡¤Î¥¹¥ì¥Ã¥É
^ :ÊÖ»öÀè
_:¼«Ê¬¤Ø¤ÎÊÖ»ö
>:Ʊ¤¸ÊÖ»öÀè¤ò»ý¤Äµ»ö¡ÊÁ°¡Ë
<:Ʊ¤¸ÊÖ»öÀè¤ò»ý¤Äµ»ö¡Ê¸å¡Ë
---:ʬ³ä¤·¤Æ¥¹¥ì¥Ã¥Éɽ¼¨¡¢ºÆÉ½¼¨
| :ʬ³ä¤·¤Æ¡Ê½Ä¡Ë¥¹¥ì¥Ã¥Éɽ¼¨¡¢ºÆÉ½¼¨
~ :¥¹¥ì¥Ã¥É¤Î¥Õ¥ì¡¼¥à¾Ãµî
.:¥¤¥ó¥Ç¥Ã¥¯¥¹
..:¥¤¥ó¥Ç¥Ã¥¯¥¹¤Î¥¤¥ó¥Ç¥Ã¥¯¥¹
Issue #6687 has been reported by merborne (kyo endo).
----------------------------------------
Feature #6687: Enumerable#with
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6687
Author: merborne (kyo endo)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
=begin
Let me propose `Enumerable#with` for an alias of `Enumerable#each_with_object` or replace of it.
`Enumerable#each_with_object`??®ã?¨ã?¤ã?ªã?¢ã?¹ã????¾ã????¯ã????®ç½®???????????¨ã????¦ã??`Enumerable#with`??????æ¡??????¾ã?????
##Reason
##??????
When you create a hash using `Enumerable#inject`, you should ensure that the block return the hash.
`Enumerable#inject`???使ã?£ã?¦ã??????·ã?¥ã????????????????¨ã????«ã?¯ã???????ã????¯ã?®è???????¤ã?¨ã????¦ã??????·ã?¥ã??è¿?????????¨ã??ä¿?証ã?????å¿?è¦????????????¾ã?????
words.inject(Hash.new(0)) { |h, word| h[word] += 1; h } # => {"You"=>3, "say"=>10, "Yes"=>1, "I"=>7, "No"=>1, "Stop"=>1, "and"=>2, "Go"=>1, "go"=>2, "Oh"=>1, "no"=>1, "Goodbye"=>2, "Hello"=>2, "hello"=>5, "don"=>2, "t"=>2, "know"=>2, "why"=>2, "you"=>2, "goodbye"=>1}
Many rubyists, however, hate this, and there are many discussions for it.
?????????????????????å«????Rubyist??¯å????????????????ä¸???§ã????®æ?¹å????«ã?¤ã????¦ã?®è°è«?????????°ã????°è??????????¾ã?????
Feature #5662: inject-accumulate, or Haskell's mapAccum* - ruby-trunk - Ruby Issue Tracking System http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5662
Ruby inject with intial being a hash - Stack Overflow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9434162/ruby-inject-with-intial-being-a-hash
`Enumerable#each_with_object` is often presented for one of the best solutions for it.
????????¦ã????®æ???????ªè§£æ±ºç????¨ã????¦ã??Enumerable#each_with_object??????示ã???????¦ã????¾ã????????
words.each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) { |word, h| h[word] += 1 } # => {"You"=>3, "say"=>10, "Yes"=>1, "I"=>7, "No"=>1, "Stop"=>1, "and"=>2, "Go"=>1, "go"=>2, "Oh"=>1, "no"=>1, "Goodbye"=>2, "Hello"=>2, "hello"=>5, "don"=>2, "t"=>2, "know"=>2, "why"=>2, "you"=>2, "goodbye"=>1}
However, `each_with_object` is still unfamiliar and then not used frequently. The biggest reason, I think, is its lengthy name.
?????????????????®æ????¨æ?§ã?«ã??????????????ä¾???¶ã?¨ã?????each_with_object??®ç?¥å??度ã???????³å?©ç?¨é?»åº¦??¯ä? ????¨æ?????????¾ã?????????????¦ã???????®å???????¯ã???????®å???????®é?·ã????«ã???????¨è???????¾ã?????
`each_with_object` is the 39th longest-name method among 754 at Ruby 1.9.3, based on following calculation;
以ä????®æ??ç®???«ã????????Ruby1.9.3??®ç?°å??ä¸????each_with_object??¯ã??754ä»¶ä¸39??ªç?®ã?«é?·ã??????????®ã?¡ã?½ã???????§ã??????????¨ã?????????????¾ã????????
methods = Module.constants.flat_map do |c|
next [] if c == :Gem
k = Module.const_get(c)
k.methods(false) + k.instance_methods(false) rescue []
end.uniq.reject { |m| "#{m}".start_with? '_deprecated' }.sort_by { |m| -m.size }
methods.size # => 754
methods.index(:each_with_object) # => 39
puts methods.take(100).group_by(&:size).to_a
The output is here.
??ºå????§ã?????
26
protected_instance_methods
instance_variable_defined?
25
protected_method_defined?
24
private_instance_methods
23
class_variable_defined?
public_instance_methods
define_singleton_method
private_method_defined?
22
singleton_method_added
public_instance_method
public_method_defined?
21
instance_variable_get
instance_variable_set
remove_class_variable
20
private_class_method
repeated_combination
repeated_permutation
compare_by_identity?
19
respond_to_missing?
abort_on_exception=
public_class_method
compare_by_identity
18
undefine_finalizer
instance_variables
abort_on_exception
class_variable_get
class_variable_set
relative_path_from
17
internal_encoding
external_encoding
default_internal=
default_external=
protected_methods
singleton_methods
ascii_compatible?
16
global_variables
executable_real?
initialize_clone
each_with_object # <= Here!
require_relative
private_constant
default_external
included_modules
instance_methods
define_finalizer
default_internal
15
private_methods
fixed_encoding?
class_variables
instance_method
each_with_index
public_constant
garbage_collect
source_location
valid_encoding?
singleton_class
world_writable?
local_variables
world_readable?
method_defined?
14
readable_real?
locale_charmap
const_defined?
collect_concat
initialize_dup
add_trace_func
close_on_exec=
close_on_exec?
named_captures
set_trace_func
write_nonblock
writable_real?
each_codepoint
force_encoding
public_methods
13
const_missing
each_filename
default_proc=
set_backtrace
public_method
read_nonblock
instance_exec
absolute_path
count_objects
instance_eval
12
marshal_load
reverse_each
exclude_end?
instance_of?
make_symlink
set_encoding
block_given?
default_proc
slice_before
marshal_dump
11
rationalize
realdirpath
each_object
expand_path
with_object
This result shows that methods which has 15+ name length is mostly for reflection or for special purpose. `each_with_object` is a general purpose method, the name should be shorter.
?????®ã?ªã?¹ã??????????????????????¨ã?¯ã????·ã??15???è¶?????????¡ã?½ã???????¯ã????®å¤§????????ªã????¬ã?¯ã?·ã?§ã?³ç?¨ã????¹æ????®ç????¨ã?®ã????®ã?§ã???????¨ã?????äº?å®???§ã?????each_with_object??¯ã?????æ± ?¨ç????ªã?¡ã?½ã???????§ã????????????????®å???????¯ã????£ã?¨ç?ã?????????¹ã????¨è???????¾ã???????¶ã?®é?·ã????¯ã???????®ã?¡ã?½ã??????????¡ã???????®ã?«ã????¦ã????¾ã?????
I propose Enumerable#with for it. a word `object` in `each_with_object` is obvious and not necessary to spcify the purpose, because all data in Ruby is `object`. Also, a word `each` in `each_with_object` is not essential, then omittable in view of the fact that it is called to Enumerable object. I think that a word `with` still works for describing the same of `each_with_object`.
?????????Enumerable#with??????æ¡??????¾ã???????¾ã?????Ruby??§æ?±ã????????????¼ã?¿ã?¯ã????¹ã?¦ã?ªã????¸ã?§ã?¯ã????§ã???????????each_with_object??«ã????????object??¯è?ªæ? ?§ã?????ä¸?è¦???¨è???????¾ã?????次ã?«ã??Enumerable??ªã????¸ã?§ã?¯ã????«å¯¾????????¡ã?½ã???????¼ã?³å?ºã????¨ã???????¹ã?????è¦???¦ã??each???å¿??????®ã????®ã?¨ã?¯è????????????????¤å?½ã?¨è???????¾ã?????????????¦æ????£ã??with??§å???????«ã????®ç?®ç???????¤ã?¾ã??Enumerable??ªè??ç´????ä»»æ???®ã?ªã????¸ã?§ã?¯ã????¨å?±ã?«æ??ä½?????????????????³ã?§ã????¦ã???????¨è???????¾ã?????
Lastly, following is examples with `Enumerable#with`
???å¾???«ã??`Enumerable#with`???使ã?£ã??ä¾????示ã????¾ã?????
Enumerable.send(:alias_method, :with, :each_with_object)
words.with(Hash.new(0)) { | word, h| h[word] += 1 } # => {"You"=>3, "say"=>10, "Yes"=>1, "I"=>7, "No"=>1, "Stop"=>1, "and"=>2, "Go"=>1, "go"=>2, "Oh"=>1, "no"=>1, "Goodbye"=>2, "Hello"=>2, "hello"=>5, "don"=>2, "t"=>2, "know"=>2, "why"=>2, "you"=>2, "goodbye"=>1}
[*1..10].with(5).map(&:*) # => [5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50]
['ruby', 'python', 'haskell'].with('ist').map(&:+) # => ["rubyist", "pythonist", "haskellist"]
Thank you for your consideration.
???æ¤?è¨ ?®ç????????????????é¡??????´ã????¾ã?????
=end
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/