Alex Young <alex / blackkettle.org> wrote:
> On 25/06/12 23:44, rue (Eero Saynatkari) wrote:
> >Issue #6647 has been updated by rue (Eero Saynatkari).
> >
> >$stderr/warn, but this would improve the current situation significantly.
> >
> >Can significant upgrade problems be expected if .abort_on_exception defaulted to true? This would seem to be the behaviour to suit most users.
> 
> That sounds a little extreme, although I wouldn't object.  I'd be
> happy with them not being silently swallowed.

I think aborting the whole process is extreme (though, I usually do
it myself).

I would very much like to see this via $stderr/warn, though.