Sam wrote:
> Wrote "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger / qwest.com>, on Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 01:04:25AM +0900:
> 
>>>>Right.  It is unnecessary check.  Thank you.
>>>
>>>Maybe a good idea nonetheless. It might catch a bug someday. Nothing 
>>>*guarantees* that argc is nonnegative, not even for main().
> 
> 
> If you don't trust your runtime, nothing is guaranteed... and you are
> on a slippery slope to insanity.

The argument value in question (in array.c) is not set by the runtime. 
It just has the same name. See my earlier post for why it has nothing to 
do with trusting the runtime.

Steve