Hi --

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Eric Hodel wrote:

> On 19 Feb 2005, at 10:36, David A. Black wrote:
>> 
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "Readline-powered" vs. "simple".  Both
>> versions depend on the presence of Readline.  I'm not sure how else
>> one would do it.
>
> Ah!  I thought your version was Readline-free, because it made no explicit 
> checks.  (Not everybody has Readline ruby libraries installed.)

The checks have already been performed by the time you get to the part
that my patch applies to, so the patch didn't need to include any
checks.


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack / wobblini.net