(2011/08/26 2:45), Aaron Patterson wrote:
> Can we make it use a regular ivar for `path` rather than an ivar with no
> "@"?  Using private ivars like this makes life hard for doing
> introspection (like the introspection required for YAML to dump / load).

I don't have any objection.  Matz, what do you think about it?

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net