nobu.nokada / softhome.net wrote:

> Moin,

Moin.

>>If it ignores \r in options it probably ought to ignore it generally by 
>>removing it from ARGV. (There's cases where no options is specified and 
>>the invocation would be "ruby \r file")
> 
> It would be impossible to tell if an option comes from shebang
> line or command line till the script file will get read, I
> gueses.  So -I/-C/-X/-r options might have problems.
> 
> 
> Index: ruby.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/ruby/src/ruby/ruby.c,v > retrieving revision 1.94 > [ruby.c patch] Thank you a lot. This looks very good to me.