I like it!

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:41 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse / airemix.jp> wrote:

> (2011/12/03 4:20), Yehuda Katz wrote:
> > Yeah=85 it would be nice to be able to do:
> >
> >   if proc.arity_range.include?(2)
> >   if method.arity_range.include?(2)
>
> Is it really required way?
>
> For example you want to know whether you can obj.meth(a, b) or not,
> it should be something like obj.callable?(:meth, a, b), shouldn't it?
>
> --
> NARUSE, Yui  <naruse / airemix.jp>
>
>