Subject: Re: Allowing custom number literal suffixes?
From: Florian Gro<florgro@ a . m
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:43:30 +0900
References: 408641074109411241134115
In-reply-to: 4115
Brent Roman wrote:
> So, why insist that suffixes be single letters?
I do not insist on that. It was just not necessary for my proposal.
And yes, IMHO %q!foo!bar could work as well as "foo"bar.