< :前の番号
^ :番号順リスト
> :次の番号
P :前の記事
N :次の記事
|<:スレッドの先頭
>|:次のスレッド
^ :返事先
_:自分への返事
>:同じ返事先を持つ記事（前）
<:同じ返事先を持つ記事（後）
---:分割してスレッド表示、再表示
| :分割して（縦）スレッド表示、再表示
~ :スレッドのフレーム消去
.:インデックス
..:インデックスのインデックス
> Bump. =A0Can someone please give feedback? =A0What needs to change in thi=
s
> patch before it can be applied?
>
> Thanks!
Hey, you said matz has an another idea. So, we need to hear it. isn't it?
Personally, my feelings are,
- read_nonblock and try_read_nonblock have too small difference to
make separate method. then, instead, I'd prefet to add an keyword
argument to read_nonblock.
- I can imagine IO::WaitReadable is annoying to use. but I'm not sure
how much affect it a performance. Did anyone mesure it?
- We need doc update about "select + readpartial is unsafe" issue.
Can anyone volunteer it?
And, for clarify, I think nobody replay Eric pointed following issue.
Although I'm not sure it is important or not.
- Yehuda's original patch don't accept_nonblock and connect_nonblock.
- current write_nonblock return written byte. but it is unuseful.
current String is designed intentionally byte operation unfrinedly.