Hi,

2011/11/15 Thomas Sawyer <transfire / gmail.com>:
> (a) plenty of other ways to define syntax. maybe best way is to separate it from def since it is optional, e.g.
>
>  ¨Âéç æïï¨Óôòéîç>
>  ¨Âåæ æïï¨óôòéîç> ..
>  ¨Âîä

I prefer method annotations to special syntax.

> (b) not sure how it can honor duck typing. i think the whole idea is to (optionally) roast the duck!

FYI, Scala supports statically checked duck typing.  See
http://markthomas.info/blog/?p=66.

-- 
Shugo Maeda