On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:00 AM, U.Nakamura <usa / garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In message "[ruby-core:40748] Proposal for sustainable branch maintenance=
"
> =A0 =A0on Nov.05,2011 15:11:55, <yugui / yugui.jp> wrote:
>> =3D=3D Proposal
>> Let's parallelize the bottle-neck.
>> Review and tests are necessary for stability and compatibility of
>> released branches but these processes can be parallelized.
>> I propose the following process:
>
> I agree this in general.
>
>
>> * Another committer review the request. This reviewer checks if this
>> =A0 commit is good enough and backport it to the older branch.
>
> Do you mean the word "backport" as committing?
> If so, who changes patchlevel?
> The committer? You?

I think the committer who commit the patch should also change patch level.
Both Shyouhei's and my backport scripts automatically bump patch
level, so it is not so hard.

> Regards,
> --
> U.Nakamura <usa / garbagecollect.jp>
>
>
>



--=20
Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)
yugui / yugui.jp
http://yugui.jp