--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 06:19:19AM +0900, Joshua Ballanco wrote:
> 
> Issue #5542 has been updated by Joshua Ballanco.
> 
> 
> This was introduced in r29638:
> 
> 
>     * object.c: Make BasicObject.new accept no parameter.
>       Revert of r26135 [ruby-core:27080], as per [ruby-core:32952].
> 
> Was this change in BasicObject.new intentional? If so, is it intentional that this behavior should be different than 1.9.2? If not can we have this back-ported?

Yes, this was definitely an intentional change.  Please see the threads
mentioned in the commit message ([ruby-core:27080] and
[ruby-core:32952]).

I cannot speak for backporting this to 1.9.2.

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOsr1nAAoJEJUxcLy0/6/G7F0H/jxr7Uti2vhBod1Rm7ZjPHgz
AdLZiAHBh49FU4ZW/w+8SZeYKGcaTq3R3ZMUjgyNmRvVMSvlOWjJ5ywnFEIyoHU6
Tr5Q0vmgpi9H/z0N+MIDxIXF6aMkmY5RRyOaRW3K6u21dl93gwPDkx5kMGNtmVn2
/uSFEcacZxKLgkAfAmQO6y/sz3DAC3T6J2eGt91732aUB7vH6F39eLxROo5z5cS9
CdLarixSpfaVO6y5i96p7hpcJpcPB5rpG8g9LjklPuqiVo6xXi/0kCgyftw0qxrq
rOhlbwoTQgTN1gkjmqFh/+dsAYUHZvzsedQH5QkjY+fXxDL3WTgnv2fLCNWGcZAQR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--