+1!
On Oct 24, 2011 10:06 PM, "Charles Nutter" <headius / headius.com> wrote:

>
> Issue #5482 has been updated by Charles Nutter.
>
>
> I think we should roll back to Evan's original pure-Ruby implementation and
> get rid of all that nasty C++. After all, if we truly believe that Ruby
> makes software development more enjoyable and more productive, then it only
> stands to reason that we should eliminate all non-Ruby languages from Ruby
> implementations.
>
> Also...JRuby instead!
> ----------------------------------------
> Feature #5482: Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5482
>
> Author: Thomas Sawyer
> Status: Open
> Priority: High
> Assignee:
> Category: Joke
> Target version: 2.0
>
>
> I'll give you three great reasons why:
>
> 1. It's Ruby in Ruby (mostly).
> 2. Ruby is better.
> 3. Read #1 and #2, again.
>
> As Rubyists, if we truly believe that Ruby makes software development more
> enjoyable and more productive, then it only stands to reason that Rubinius
> be the future of Ruby.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org
>
>