(2011.10.07 01:50 ), David Graham wrote:
> Is there a chance RBTree can be added to the standard library for Ruby 2.0?

I agree with you if the library name is changed.
The name of RBTree is too specific to its internal algorithm.
If we adopt RBTree, we must change the name of the library after
more better algorithms would be discovered.

--
Kenta Murata <muraken / gmail.com>
1D69 ADDE 081C 9CC2 2E54 98C1 CEFE 8AFB 6081 B062