On Oct 6, 2011, at 9:07 PM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
> Some people think most of standard libraries should be in gem.  I =
think
> you need to persuade them.

I think the intent is for RBTree to be included with the Ruby =
distribution via the standard library or via 'standard gems'.  That is =
to say, the inclusion of RBTree into the standard Ruby 'distribution' is =
orthogonal to whether the standard distribution packages the standard =
library as gems or not.

Gary Wright