Issue #5276 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.


Indeed, this is not a regression. Backports are not always regressions, though. Could you explain why you think that only regressions should be included in 1.9.3p0?

I feel that the bugs I found recently in {Float|Integer}#round (2 each) and the one in Float#divmod are perfect candidates  to be included in 1.9.3 because
- we are still in preview mode
- these bugs are very localized and are highly unlikely to impact anything else
- these bugs can have serious consequences for anyone dealing with calculations (scientific, etc...)
----------------------------------------
Backport #5276: 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5276

Author: Yui NARUSE
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: core
Target version: 1.9.3


ruby -e'p 4294967295.8.round' must be 4294967296 but 4294967295 on 32bit environment.


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org