Hi,

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse / airemix.jp> wrote:
>> RubySpec is part of CRuby's implementation test.
>> Do you have arguments against having tests in RubySpec instead of test/ruby?
>
> Because I don't think RubySpec is part of CRuby's implementation test.
> I believe other CRuby people also think so.
> So on current situation you must add a test to test-all.
> (If you can persuade other committers, I'll follow you)

Although I'm a newbie and not great at persuading people of anything,
I'll start a new thread about this.

> Commented out ML number cooperation.

Thanks!