On Jul 8, 2011, at 10:04 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 2011/7/9 James Cox <james / imaj.es>:
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 08:25, KOSAKI Motohiro =
<kosaki.motohiro / gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>=20
>>>> Why change all the statuses to low here? I don't see the validity =
of
>>>> your change, especially as this one comes with a patch: surely that
>>>> should be higher, to ensure the patch can be cleanly applied?
>>>=20
>>> 'low' mean this ticket has no impact to 193 release schedule. I =
didn't see
>>> the patch. I think Eric and akr-san will decide to commit it or not.
>>>=20
>>=20
>> OK, thanks for the clarification. So Low status bugs can get fixed
>> prior to 1.9.3 release?
>=20
> Yes. But, for clarification, this ticket need that Eric and akr-san
> agree the change, I think.

Yes.

I am less concerned about the structure of the patch and more concerned =
about the content of the patch.  If you are experienced in the various =
socket constants I would appreciate if anyone could review the =
documentation I have added.