2011/7/9 James Cox <james / imaj.es>:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 08:25, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro / gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>> Why change all the statuses to low here? I don't see the validity of
>>> your change, especially as this one comes with a patch: surely that
>>> should be higher, to ensure the patch can be cleanly applied?
>>
>> 'low' mean this ticket has no impact to 193 release schedule. I didn't see
>> the patch. I think Eric and akr-san will decide to commit it or not.
>>
>
> OK, thanks for the clarification. So Low status bugs can get fixed
> prior to 1.9.3 release?

Yes. But, for clarification, this ticket need that Eric and akr-san
agree the change, I think.