On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 08:25, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro / gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
>> Why change all the statuses to low here? I don't see the validity of
>> your change, especially as this one comes with a patch: surely that
>> should be higher, to ensure the patch can be cleanly applied?
>
> 'low' mean this ticket has no impact to 193 release schedule. I didn't see
> the patch. I think Eric and akr-san will decide to commit it or not.
>

OK, thanks for the clarification. So Low status bugs can get fixed
prior to 1.9.3 release?