Hi,

2011/6/23 Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro / gmail.com>:
> Anyone can imagine a downside of this? It could not work as expected
> if the result of rb_file_expand_path *changes* during require (adding
> a new file during require should work.) Do we need to care such a
> case?


As far as I look the patch, paths that are once stored in cache
will never be collected.  It may be considered as a kind of
memory leaks.

I guess that it is not a problem in casual cases.  But I'm not sure
if it is really OK.

-- 
Yusuke Endoh <mame / tsg.ne.jp>