Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:36944] Re: change in timeout error"
    on Sat, 11 Jun 2011 01:06:10 +0900, SASADA Koichi <ko1 / atdot.net> writes:

|Matz, is it intentional?

Yes.  Not to catch Timeout::Error unintentionally by a non-qualified
rescue clause.

							matz.