Hi,

(2011/05/01 11:48), Eric Wong wrote:
> In 1.9.2 and earlier, rb_str_resize() always calls rb_str_modify()
> internally.  Some C extensions I maintain relied on this behavior.
> 
> In trunk, rb_str_resize() no longer calls rb_str_modify() nor unshares
> the string for copy-on-write if the string is already the desired size.
> 
> I believe this is inconsistent since a C extension would normally expect
> to write to a string (and thus need to trigger copy-on-write) if it's
> calling rb_str_resize() on it.

It seems that there are no discussion about this topic.  Who change it?

In my opinion, I can't imagine that rb_str_resize() always call
rb_str_modify().

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net