KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro / gmail.com> wrote:
> No. Please no.
> The original issue is not important one. This complex and ugly patch is no good
> tradeoff for very small performance improvement.
> 
> I'll revert r31230. If close performance is very important for you, we need more
> cleaner code.

Fair enough, I'll see about making a cleaner patch.

-- 
Eric Wong