Hi,

I don't want the choice between git migration and the biggest Windows
contributor.  Well, you guys are making my life tougher. ;-<

							matz.

In message "Re: [ruby-core:34158] Re: Moving to Git?"
    on Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:55:03 +0900, "U.Nakamura" <usa / garbagecollect.jp> writes:

|Hello,
|
|In message "[ruby-core:34134] Re: Moving to Git?"
|    on Jan.06,2011 07:18:51, <matz / ruby-lang.org> wrote:
|> Yeah, I know.  But since the one who insists git most is the guy who
|> has spent tremendous effort to make Ruby run well on Windows, I don't
|> want to underestimate his concern.
|
|I know the guy better than anyone :)
|
|He sincerely wishs the growth of the Ruby development, and
|doesn't hope he hinders it.
|Therefore, he will resign as committer with pleasure if the
|existence of him is the reason that Ruby cannot move to Git.
|
|Anyway, Ruby will move to Git some time, and he will resign
|at that time according to his insistence.
|So it is the best to find a timing that the advantage of moving
|grows more than disadvantageous, instead of thinking that he
|is obstructing moving to Git.
|
|And, for people who insist that Ruby should move to Git, it
|is the best to prove by action that there is no problem if Ruby
|misses him, then the timing of moving becomes earlier.
|They only have to mend the bug more than he and to show it.
|He is sure also sincerely to hope to see it.
|
|Regards,
|-- 
|U.Nakamura <usa / garbagecollect.jp>