On Nov 29, 2010, at 19:09, Yui NARUSE wrote:

> Issue #4100 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
>=20
> In Hunk #4, why partly using HTTP_PROXY?
> And it assumes HTTP_PROXY begins with http:// though it is not always =
URI.
>=20
> Ah, HTTP_PROXY is from original doc.

Should we correct the example to not assume that HTTP_PROXY is a URI?

Should we add a note mentioning that HTTP_PROXY may be either a host, =
host:port or URI?  (RubyGems can accept all three values so I believe =
that all three have been found in the wild.)=