2010/9/9 Aaron Patterson <aaron / tenderlovemaking.com>:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:45:50PM +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
>> >>  ¨ֲןמף÷
>> >> 1) disadvantage for the core team: developping style will get
>> >>  ¨ֲןםנלור ¨ֲטו דןעו פובם םץףפ דבעו םץלפינלו ומפיפיוףׂץגש
>> >>  ¨ֲבדכבחו במףפהליג חוםף>> >
>> > I don't think this con is true.  ¨ֲוצולןנםומפ ןז פטוףחוםף דןץלףפבש ימ
>> > the Ruby svn repository.  ¨ֲטועו יף מן עובףןמ פן כוונ פטום ימ ףונבעבפו
>> > repositories.  ¨ֲום עולובףוף דןץלגו םבהו זעןם פטׂץגש ףןץעדו יפףולז>> > Gem releases would only happen with the ruby-core member in charge of
>> > that stdlib gem deems appropriate.
>>
>> I agree.  ¨ֲלםןףבלהוצולןנועף קילל מןגו בזזודפוה גש פטיף דטבמחו>> except release managers :-)
>
> How would release managers be affected?  ¨ֲןמלש ץףעץגש ףצזן> managing my "stdlib-gem", ruby svn *always* has the most up-to-date
> version of the code,  ¨ֲטכגץילקילל בלקבשף עץםש פוףפף¬ ליזו קןץל> continue the same (I think).

We have a solution named "default gems".
rake, rdoc and minigest.
(but I don't know details)

-- 
NARUSE, Yui
naruse / airemix.jp