On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 9:19 PM,  <brabuhr / gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:30 PM, James Edward Gray II
> <james / graysoftinc.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 4, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Benoit Daloze wrote:
>>
>>> It would of course be even easier if Nokogiri was made the default.
>>
>> Yeah, I'm surprised to see so little support for Nokogiri.    >
> I have no particular objection to switching from REXML to Nokogiri,
> but I would object to removing REXML without a replacement. Though
> REXML has pretty much always met my needs just fine.)

I have a question about this REXML vs Nokogiri debate: does Nokogiri
offer a REXML-compaitble interface? If this is the case (or if one
could be easily written), then the Nokogiri / REXML replacement could
happen without breaking anything

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta