(2010/09/03 21:58), Aaron Patterson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:27:07PM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
>> 2010/9/3 NARUSE, Yui<naruse / airemix.jp>:
>>> 2010/9/2 U.Nakamura<usa / garbagecollect.jp>:
>>>> I think that we should not increase bundled libraries, because
>>>> we already have rubygems as standard library installer.
>>>
>>> I agree with this.
>>
>> We may have to do more explanation, it is Big Ruby-ism vs. Small Ruby-ism.
>> Big Ruby-ism thinks that Ruby package should be all-in-one package for
>> common use.
>> Small Ruby-ism thinks that Ruby package should be as small as it can
>> (bundle libs depended by RubyGems).
> 
> I think there is a third option: Medium Ruby-ism.  Convert all of stdlib
> to be gems, and have Ruby ship with a default set of gems.

Libraries depended by gem, test or rdoc must be bundled.
Most of current libraries are such things.

-- 
NARUSE, Yui  <naruse / airemix.jp>