2010/9/3 Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby / zenspider.com>:
>
> On Sep 2, 2010, at 13:47 , brabuhr / gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby / zenspider.com> wrote:
>>> On Sep 2, 2010, at 02:07 , U.Nakamura wrote:
>>>>> May I go forward with committing nokogiri to trunk under ext?
>>>>
>>>> What is the reason to bundle nokogiri?
>>>>
>>>> I think that we should not increase bundled libraries, because
>>>> we already have rubygems as standard library installer.
>>>
>>> Then can we please unbundle rexml?
>>
>> What is the reason to unbundle rexml?
>
> primarily: usability, speed, and maintenance.
>
> secondarily: nokogiri is a much better tool and more people will use it if the playing field is level to begin with... (think of all the hours saved from porting rexml code over to nokogiri).
>
> We spend a lot of time on IRC fielding ("unnecessary") questions about rexml. I'd like to see that go away in the future.

What is the question for example?

Anyway you can simply answer to use nokogiri, can't you?

-- 
NARUSE, Yui
naruse / airemix.jp