On Jul 26, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Luis Lavena wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Evan Phoenix <evan / fallingsnow.net> =
wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>> When we decide that the changes in 1.9 are the proper ones, then I'll =
feed them back into rubygems. Is there a reason to do it sooner? Why are =
people using rubygems master on 1.9 trunk?
>>=20
>=20
> RubyInstaller building recipes put RubyGems packages (1.3.7 or
> anything) into the Ruby installation because back in 1.9.1, RubyGems
> was too old.
>=20
> This can be disabled if that is the case for 1.9.3/1.9.3 (trunk) if
> that is the case.

I think it should be disabled, yes.

 - Evan

>=20
> --=20
> Luis Lavena
> AREA 17
> -
> Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to =
add,
> but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
> Antoine de Saint-Exup=E9ry
>=20
>=20